|
Equipment layout
It is essential to achieve a good
balance in the recording studio control room between good acoustics and ease of
operation of the equipment.
I have spent more time scratching my head
over equipment layout over the years than any other problem in my home project
studio. The trouble is that there seems to be no ideal solution for one person
studio operation. Bear in mind that the engineer/musician is operating a mixing
console, keyboard, synth modules, effects, multitrack, stereo tape recorder,
sequencer and probably a few other things at the same time. 'At the same time’
is the key phrase, because apart from the stereo recorder used for the final
mix, all of the other equipment is in use all the time. You end up bobbing about
from one piece of equipment to another. There’s no studio layout to suit all
circumstances but let’s have a look at the example of a keyboard playing
recordist who wants to work quickly and effectively from a fixed position.
The first problem our keyboard orientated
recordist will have to face in laying out the studio is whether to have the
master keyboard or the mixing console in front of the speakers. Of course, pro
studios always have the console in front of the speakers, because that is where
the engineer sits. The keyboard player can go somewhere else, probably to a less
than optimum listening position. When you are the engineer and the keyboard
player you have a dilemma. Do you want the best quality sound when you are track
laying, or when you are mixing? For many people, mixing will win out. But there
are advantages the other way. For one thing, it is much more inspirational to
hear the best quality sound from the optimum listening position while you are
recording. Or why not have two pairs of speakers and a conveniently placed
switch so that you can have the best of both worlds?
Let’s say you have opted to have the
console in front of the speakers. Now where do you put the keyboard? To the left
of the console? To the right? In parallel with it so you have to turn right
round to play? I’ll go for the left, at right angles to the console. I choose
this option because it gives me easy access to the input channels of the
console, which are conventionally situated on the left, and they will be in use
together with the keyboard as the recording progresses. The computer sequencer
will go nicely behind and above the keyboard. Next comes the sampler and synth
module rack, assuming you have these items. This has to be very close to the
keyboard. If you need to edit the sounds as the recording progresses, and let’s
assume that you are an adventurous swashbuckling recordist, you will need to be
able to plonk the keys with one hand while you tweak the expander with the
other. There is no substitute for having these two within an armspan! If this is
so obvious, why do some people have set-ups where it can’t be done?
The armspan factor dictates that the
expander rack is facing the monitors. The expander modules really ought to be at
keyboard height plus, or if they are lower than the keyboard then consider
angling them upwards. It is no use having to squat to get at awkward-to-adjust
machinery. Place things like power amps and other equipment that you can set and
forget at the bottom of your racks. The right hand side of the console is still
vacant, so it looks like a good place for the effects rack and patchbay. Once
again, preferably this should be positioned so you will not have to bend down.
Apart from equipment that you can more or less set-and-forget, the patchbay
should be the lowest thing in the rack. Why? Because the patchcords will droop
all over the controls you need to get at if it isn’t. Only put equipment below
the patchbay that you know you will use less often than the patchbay.
When you have decided on the layout and
have a pretty good idea of how you want things operationally, it’s a good idea
to go back and consider the set up acoustically. Remember that the hard flat
surfaces of the equipment cause the kind of reflections that we don’t want.
Since we can’t make the equipment itself absorbent (although we can do something
for the sides of the racks), the only option we have is to make sure that the
reflections don’t go anywhere harmful - i.e. into your ears. If you draw a
precisely dimensioned diagram, you can draw in the path followed by the direct
sound coming from the speakers. Remember that sound reflects at the same angle
at which it strikes a surface and you will be able to draw the pattern of
reflections. Are any of them hitting the engineer’s ears? Then angle the
equipment so that the reflections aim into a more remote part of the studio.
This is not audio black magic but a way of fine-tuning the sound of a room by
very simple methods - and you can’t say that it costs any money to consider how
your equipment is angled. By now, as long as your console isn’t too wide, you
should have a system which you can operate without leaving your comfortable
seat. I haven’t included the positioning of the multitrack, but it could be
worked into the set-up quite easily, or you could put your hand in your pocket
and buy a remote control (why don’t they come with infra red remotes like TVs
and videos?).
If
the layout I have devised doesn’t suit your studio arrangements, then I hope
that the procedure I have followed, considering how the acoustics and the
different pieces of equipment interact, will help you work out your own layout
plans more easily. Every set up involves weighing up compromises between
acoustics, convenience and versatility. Make one factor better and it is likely
the other two will suffer. Think carefully about how you want to work in your
studio and you will get the compromise that suits you best.
|